Thursday, September 03, 2026

2026 Daily - 09/03/2026 - only a DRAFT about Leadership...

 Morning ... at services...

Later now -- THOUGHT... Leaders want to lead... and will do what they need to do to WIN access to that role... And - fear is the best short term way to move voters - IT SEEMS... 

from AI, Google:

AI Overview
Talmudic leadership focuses on humility, shared responsibility, empowering others, and serving the community rather than seeking personal power.
Core Principles of Talmudic Leadership
  • Humility and Service: Leaders are taught to view themselves as servants of the community. True authority comes from modesty, mirroring figures like Moses and Hillel the Elder. [1]
  • Empowering Others: A great leader creates more leaders rather than passive followers, sharing knowledge and responsibility so the community can grow. [1]
  • Accountability to Truth: Talmudic texts emphasize that leaders must value truth above ego, meaning they should readily admit when they are wrong rather than protecting a false sense of infallibility. [1]
  • Rejecting Fear-Based Control: The Talmud warns that leaders who rule through intimidation for personal gain rather than for higher moral purposes will ultimately fail. [1]
  • Shared Wisdom and Education: Leadership involves continuous teaching, patience, and ensuring knowledge is deeply transmitted and understood across generations. [1]
Further Exploration


=====================================

Google AI question: ethics of the fathers about reluctance leadership and here is answer

Talmud/Ethics section says: AI Overview

In Pirkei Avot (The Ethics of the Fathers), the concept of leadership is approached with deep caution, strongly advocating for reluctant leadership. The text teaches that power, honor, and public office should never be pursued for personal gain or prestige. However, it balances this reluctance with an uncompromising obligation to step into leadership roles when the community truly needs it. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The primary framework of reluctant leadership in Pirkei Avot is defined by several core principles:
1. Guarding Against the Traps of Power
The sages repeatedly warn that pursuing positions of authority can corrupt an individual's character and disrupt their personal peace. [1, 2]
  • Hating Lordship: Shemaiah famously counsels: "Love work, hate lordship [rabbanut/superiority], and do not make yourself known to the ruling authorities" (Pirkei Avot 1:10). True leaders view authority not as a privilege to be desired, but as a heavy burden to be handled carefully. [1, 2]
  • Distrusting Politics: Rabban Gamaliel adds a cautionary note about political power: "Be careful with the ruling authorities, for they only befriend a person for their own needs" (Pirkei Avot 2:3). [1]
2. Shunning Honor and Greatness
A foundational virtue of ancient Jewish leadership is a profound reluctance to occupy the limelight. [1, 2]
  • Fleeing Fame: Chapter 6 lists "fleeing from honor" and having a "reluctance to hand down rulings" among the essential qualities of a sage. [1]
  • Deflecting Praise: The text counsels: "Do not seek greatness for yourself, and do not lust for honor" (Pirkei Avot 6:5). A reluctant leader recognizes that true honor should be directed outward toward others and God, rather than consumed by oneself. [1, 2, 3]
3. Stepping Up Out of Necessity
Despite warnings to avoid authority, Pirkei Avot does not endorse complete passive withdrawal. Reluctant leaders must overcome their hesitation if a leadership vacuum puts the community at risk. [1, 2]
  • Filling the Void: Hillel states: "In a place where there are no men, strive to be a man" (Pirkei Avot 2:5). Commentators note this means that if no one else is willing or able to lead, an individual must sacrifice their preference for privacy and step forward. [1, 2]
  • Continuous Duty: Rabbi Tarfon offers reassurance to those overwhelmed by the magnitude of public service: "It is not your duty to finish the work, but neither are you at liberty to neglect it" (Pirkei Avot 2:16). [1]
Summary Comparison of Leadership Postures
Action / PostureThe Ideal MindsetThe Pirkei Avot Source
Seeking PowerAvoid. View authority as a burden, not a prize."Hate lordship" (1:10)
Chasing PrestigeAvoid. Flee from personal honors and public glory."Do not lust for honor" (6:5)
Facing a VacuumOvercome reluctance. Step up if the community is floundering."Strive to be a man" (2:5)
Facing Massive TasksStay committed. Do your part without needing total completion."Not at liberty to neglect it" (2:16)

===================================================


and an interesting take on leadership from Chabad: https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/4423119/jewish/The-Requirements-of-Leadership.htm

More Jewish takes: https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1435&context=jvbl

searches: talmud quotes on leadership

and

talmud leadership

and

ethics of the fathers about reluctance leadership (above is a reply to this)





Wednesday, September 02, 2026

2026 Daily - 09/02/2026 - cooperative hummingbirds - NOT and have it both ways?

 I watch hummingbirds at feeders I've set up and I sometimes wonder if any get to eat anything... because they chase each other away... only one feeds at a time (I have seen two once feed together - but that is rare). I'm told they are TERRITORIAL... but is that necessary, best, good?? If they didn't compete as they seem to do.. they all could eat . something. BUT - really - I sometimes wonder if any get to settle in and have a decent meal.

Do we humans ever behave like that? What is a Zero Sum Game? And when humans compete and contend... there is a hierarchy as to who gets what .... Fewer and fewer people at the TOP get this, that, the best... and then it goes down after that til... Some Get NONE... Is that necessary?

===============================

So ... Torah says -- don't boil a kid in its mother's milk... Talmud extends that and we are not to have cheese burgers... AND we are not to try to fully understand that and/or other laws/commandments. SO - taking things literally and clearly is not enough... we are to also put the fence around the Torah so as to not disobey ... but this is like having it both/all ways. Are we not adding to the words of Torah? 

On another hand -- if we were to explain or at least be PRECISE wouldn't that be wonderful? It would be following the law and simply, really knowing the law...  Seems like a good idea to me?!

Tuesday, September 01, 2026

2026 Daily - 09/01/2026 - Brave? Techno-world

 First day of September.. a Tuesday. I am continuing to  NOT go out.... w/big catheter... But I did get info form doctor's office... and I will continue to wear til Friday (or Thursday night)...

About our TECHNO-WORLD..  and big data and surveilance... and freedom... etc.. POWER is still the issue and also general consensus about what The People want is the issue. Powerful people... organizations, entities... countries... with their leaders offer something to The People... and so dictators and kings, etc.. are GIVEN the power to do what is wanted... 

What is wanted? A peaceful life... The opportunities of individuals to relate how they will with whom they want to relate and do stuff... have basic needs and also more than just basic needs and fun and happiness. AND PEACE is the basis for all!!!!

IF people could live together without strife... without needs or unfulfilled wants ... than powerful leaders might not be needed.  That is the point about Love your neighbor -- and don't do to others what you want not done to you. Are police needed? Are PEACEKEEPERS needed? 

The historical norm is there is a need for Peacekeepers... police... and yet successful leaders and their groups fill the real essential needs of their people... and those needs start with Peace.. and are supported by food, shelter, and clothing... AND extras are always nice, too.

It is simple really - EVERYONE gets what they need... and whoever wants more.. works more. It is like parents taking care and providing for their children. It is not socialism or communism... IT IS FAMILY...

Monday, August 31, 2026

2026 Daily - 08/31/2026 - Prep for the future -- scifi and such - Fairness or power

 I've been watching The Capture ... about video hacking, fakes... and the like. In the past I watched Person of Interest... Both depict a present....??? or near future ... when video/audio surveilance is ubiquitous. Scary and believable ... and POSSIBLE??? With enough cameras and computing power I think YES... And that is amazingly scary.

SO -- in the past I've read a lot of science fiction which when good is pretty realistic. Maybe not happening ... but possible... and probably in some ways - small? - happening. For instance - beam-me-up ... teleportation.. Possible .... Needs lots and lots of power...And then - Space Elevators... needs the kind of materials that are light and strong.... Possible.  Good sci-fi suggests the expansion... of realities that are current but inpractical... and then they someday do become real and practical...

AND SCARY... So - sci-fi once for me prepared me for a good new world... But a Brave New World... may be what we get. The two shows mentioned above suggest and show how technologies that are nearly/or really here can be manipulative, controlling, etc.. 

Today we are mostly concerned with AI and how smart if seems and how much it can do without risking human lives or how it can replace human drudgery ... and yet -- are those the real problems?

Secretive uses of AI... with surveilance and POWER behind it... machine or HUMAN... is wildly problematical. In Episode 2-5 - a character shows how his ALGORITHYM elects a candidate by molding perceptions and sending out messages to fragments of the populace and thus gains the majority edge needed to be elected. It is not even illegitimate... It is using information and creaing appropriate messages and it can all be rather open and known..../??  The issue would be is the data being used legally, etc being gathered for the use by the Systems?

BTW - Issac Asimov predicted the use of massive data in his Foundation Series.. calling the science: psychohistory. As wikipedia says in its article about the Foundation (novel series): "the mathematician Hari Seldon devises the theory of psychohistory, a new and effective mathematics of sociology. Using statistical laws of mass action, it can predict the future of large populations."

Legal issues? Moral issues? Ethics... - They all have, do, and will bow to POWER.. Therefore the question is - how can the people being controlled control power? Democracy is an answer and AI,etc may seem to mock that ... I suppose two parties could use AIetc and battle it out.It is when outside countries, forces (Russa, China, etc) interfere in the internal affairs of other countries that there is a BIG PROBLEM... Which can be/might be countered??!!!

Access to data - big amounts of data... about individuals and their habits and interests... their LIVES... is something TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT...  I have said - it doesn't matter what people know about me... I do not do bad, shameful, immoral things... BUT aggregate me with other like me and unlike me and then send out messages tailored to individuals and their invisible groups.... THEN I can see the problem.

I still think... if all parties had equal access then all parties could battle it out, so to speak, on equal footing ... as they have always... Politicians have always tailored speeches to their audiences. There was a time such tailoring was not known (communication technologies didn't broadcast them) and then they were known... Instant News... And now: the new world has to simply take into account the speed at which news moves. Truth... as opposed to deepfakes...must be available and known and then the electorate can weigh in. YES -- DEEPFAKES can fool . but the public may be able to come to understand and get at the real facts and truths. Heinlien had the Fair Witness professionals who: "only reports exactly what they see or hear. They do not extrapolate. For example, if asked what color a house is, a normal person says "white." A Fair Witness says, "It is white on the side facing me." (from Google AI answer).

A question I would pose for today's divided world... - What can bring us together to some consensus? Rotary has its four questions and they are a basis for consensus and united living. They are:

The Four Questions
  • Is it the TRUTH?
  • Is it FAIR to all concerned?
  • Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIPS?
  • Will it be BENEFICIAL to all concerned?


And so there are ways to pursue truth with the use of psychology and sociology and information. I hope!